AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-150
Agricultural
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 354 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Agricultural
Agrinar T-150 vs CaseIH Puma 150
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 150
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AgrinarAgrinar T-150
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedT-150150 hp
Puma 150150 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
T-150 is in the 69th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 69th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 150 higher · +57 ci (+16%)T-150354 ci
Puma 150411 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
T-150 is in the 52nd percentile; Puma 150 is in the 70th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedT-1506
Puma 1506
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
T-150 is in the 74th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 150 higher · +6 (+50%)T-15012
Puma 15018
Median Agricultural Tractor16
T-150 is in the 33rd percentile; Puma 150 is in the 68th · 972 models
T-150 (A)Puma 150 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | CaseIH | — |
| Model | T-150 | Puma 150 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | FPT | — |
| Model | T6 354-4 | Turbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ T-150+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 354ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 150+57 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ Puma 150+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 150+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,460lb | 13,900lb | ▲ Puma 150+6,440 lb · +86% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 24,251lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agrinar T-150 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 69th percentile (150 hp)B · 69th percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 52nd percentile (354 ci)B · 70th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 33rd percentile (12)B · 68th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 28th percentile (7,460 lb)B · 65th percentile (13,900 lb)
A · T-150B · Puma 150Median Agricultural Tractor