Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 200
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 301 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 200 vs Farmall 400
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 400
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 200
vs
FarmallFarmall 400
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 200 higher · +37 ci (+14%)200301 ci
400264 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
200 is in the 32nd percentile; 400 is in the 19th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 200 higher · +2 (+50%)2006
4004
Median Row Crop Tractor6
200 is in the 50th percentile; 400 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 400 higher · +2 (+25%)2008
40010
Median Row Crop Tractor16
200 is in the 16th percentile; 400 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 200 higher · +1,024 lb (+16%)2007,324 lb
4006,300 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
200 is in the 17th percentile; 400 is in the 13th · 1,350 models
200 (A)400 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Farmall | — |
| Model | 200 | 400 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Allis Chalmers | C264 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ 200+750 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 200+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 301ci | 264ci | ▲ 200+37 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4in | ▲ 400+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 400+0.9 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh-helical gears | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 176in | 141in | ▲ 200+35 in · +25% |
| Width | 87.6in | 107in | ▲ 400+19.4 in · +22% |
| Height | 118in | 80.8in | ▲ 200+37.2 in · +46% |
| Operating Weight | 7,324lb | 6,300lb | ▲ 200+1,024 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Hydra-Touch | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | IH Fast Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,608lb | 2,000lb | ▲ 200+2,608 lb · +130% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Ball actuated disc | Manual disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.5gal | 6.5gal | ▲ 400+2 gal · +44% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 200 | Farmall 400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 32nd percentile (301 ci)B · 19th percentile (264 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 17th percentile (7,324 lb)B · 13th percentile (6,300 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 44th percentile (176 in)B · 12th percentile (141 in)
A · 200B · 400Median Row Crop Tractor