Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 210
Row Crop
- power
- 136 hp
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 210 vs CaseIH Puma 140
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 140
Utility
- power
- 140 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 210
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 140 higher · +4 hp (+3%)210136 hp
Puma 140140 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
210 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 140 is in the 51st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 210 higher · +15 ci (+4%)210426 ci
Puma 140411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
210 is in the 72nd percentile; Puma 140 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2106
Puma 1406
Median Row Crop Tractor6
210 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 140 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 140 higher · +10 (+125%)2108
Puma 14018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
210 is in the 16th percentile; Puma 140 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
210 (A)Puma 140 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 210 | Puma 140 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CNH | — |
| Model | 3500 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 136hp | 140hp | ▲ Puma 140+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 426ci | 411ci | ▲ 210+15 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ 210+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 140+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,425lb | 13,725lb | ▲ Puma 140+1,300 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Disc type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 210 | CaseIH Puma 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 50th percentile (136 hp)B · 51st percentile (140 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 72nd percentile (426 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 50th percentile (12,425 lb)B · 60th percentile (13,725 lb)
A · 210B · Puma 140Median Row Crop Tractor