Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 220
Row Crop
- power
- 151 hp
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 220 vs CaseIH Puma 150
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 150
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 220
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 220 higher · +1 hp (<1%)220151 hp
Puma 150150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
220 is in the 58th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 57th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 220 higher · +15 ci (+4%)220426 ci
Puma 150411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
220 is in the 72nd percentile; Puma 150 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2206
Puma 1506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
220 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 150 higher · +10 (+125%)2208
Puma 15018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
220 is in the 16th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
220 (A)Puma 150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 220 | Puma 150 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | FPT | — |
| Model | 3500 | Turbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 151hp | 150hp | ▲ 220+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 426ci | 411ci | ▲ 220+15 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ 220+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 150+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,160lb | 13,900lb | ▲ Puma 150+1,740 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 24,251lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Dry disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 220 | CaseIH Puma 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 58th percentile (151 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 72nd percentile (426 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 50th percentile (12,160 lb)B · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)
A · 220B · Puma 150Median Row Crop Tractor