Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Cub Cadet 7252
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet 7252
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 45.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7252
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied502025 hp
725225 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; 7252 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5020 higher · +31.5 ci (+69%)502077.1 ci
725245.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; 7252 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied50202
72522
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; 7252 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5020 higher · +463 lb (+29%)50202,060 lb
72521,597 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5020 is in the 13th percentile; 7252 is in the 7th · 5,107 models
5020 (A)7252 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | 5020 | 7252 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Kawasaki | — |
| Model | S126 | FD750 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ 7252+1,100 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 45.6ci | ▲ 5020+31.5 ci · +69% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.1in | ▲ 5020+0.5 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 5020+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 91in | ▲ 5020+7.9 in · +9% |
| Width | 48in | 48in | Same |
| Height | 75.6in | 53in | ▲ 5020+22.6 in · +43% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 1,597lb | ▲ 5020+463 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center Gear Pump | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | 0.9gal | ▲ 5020+0.4 gal · +44% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Cub Cadet 7252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (45.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,597 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (98.9 in)B · 4th percentile (91 in)
A · 5020B · 7252Median Utility Tractor