Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Ford 9N
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
FordFord 9N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9N higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)502025 hp
9N25.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; 9N is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +42.9 ci (+56%)502077.1 ci
9N120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; 9N is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +2 (+100%)50202
9N4
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; 9N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5020 higher · +5 (+167%)50208
9N3
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; 9N is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
5020 (A)9N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | 5020 | 9N | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Ford | — |
| Model | S126 | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.1hp | ▲ 9N+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,001RPM | ▲ 5020+499 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 9N+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 120ci | ▲ 9N+42.9 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.2in | ▲ 5020+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.8in | ▲ 9N+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 115in | ▲ 9N+16.1 in · +16% |
| Width | 48in | 64in | ▲ 9N+16 in · +33% |
| Height | 75.6in | 52in | ▲ 5020+23.6 in · +45% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 3,576lb | ▲ 9N+1,516 lb · +74% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 558rpm | ▲ 9N+18 rpm · +3% |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 4.00x19 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 10.00x28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 798lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Differential mechanical shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | 3gal | ▲ 9N+1.7 gal · +131% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 30th percentile (3,576 lb)
A · 5020B · 9NMedian Utility Tractor