Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Hinomoto E2602
Image not recorded
HinomotoModel B
Hinomoto E2602
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 85.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
HinomotoHinomoto E2602
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ E2602 higher · +1 hp (+4%)502025 hp
E260226 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; E2602 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ E2602 higher · +8 ci (+10%)502077.1 ci
E260285.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; E2602 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ E2602 higher · +1 (+50%)50202
E26023
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; E2602 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ E2602 higher · +518 lb (+25%)50202,060 lb
E26022,578 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5020 is in the 13th percentile; E2602 is in the 17th · 5,107 models
5020 (A)E2602 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Hinomoto | — |
| Model | 5020 | E2602 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Toyosha | Same |
| Model | S126 | 3S139 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ E2602+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ E2602+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 85.1ci | ▲ E2602+8 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 105in | ▲ E2602+6.1 in · +6% |
| Width | 48in | 48in | Same |
| Height | 75.6in | 72in | ▲ 5020+3.6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 2,578lb | ▲ E2602+518 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Hinomoto E2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 14th percentile (85.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 17th percentile (2,578 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (98.9 in)B · 11th percentile (105 in)
A · 5020B · E2602Median Utility Tractor