Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Iseki TM3265
Image not recorded
IsekiModel B
Iseki TM3265
Utility
- power
- 25.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
IsekiIseki TM3265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TM3265 higher · +0.7 hp (+3%)502025 hp
TM326525.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; TM3265 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TM3265 higher · +14.3 ci (+19%)502077.1 ci
TM326591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; TM3265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ TM3265 higher · +1 (+50%)50202
TM32653
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; TM3265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied50208
TM32658
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; TM3265 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
5020 (A)TM3265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Iseki | — |
| Model | 5020 | TM3265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Iseki | — |
| Model | S126 | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.7hp | ▲ TM3265+0.7 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ TM3265+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ TM3265+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 91.4ci | ▲ TM3265+14.3 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.4in | ▲ 5020+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.3in | ▲ 5020+0.4 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 113in | ▲ TM3265+14.1 in · +14% |
| Width | 48in | 43.7in | ▲ 5020+4.3 in · +10% |
| Height | 75.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 1,896lb | ▲ 5020+164 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Iseki TM3265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,896 lb)
A · 5020B · TM3265Median Utility Tractor