Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Mitsubishi GS250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS250
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5020 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)502025 hp
GS25024.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; GS250 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GS250 higher · +3.3 ci (+4%)502077.1 ci
GS25080.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; GS250 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GS250 higher · +1 (+50%)50202
GS2503
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; GS250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GS250 higher · +4 (+50%)50208
GS25012
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; GS250 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
5020 (A)GS250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 5020 | GS250 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S126 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 5020+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ GS250+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GS250+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 80.4ci | ▲ GS250+3.3 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.1in | ▲ 5020+0.5 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.6in | ▲ 5020+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 107in | ▲ GS250+8.1 in · +8% |
| Width | 48in | 45.3in | ▲ 5020+2.7 in · +6% |
| Height | 75.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 1,962lb | ▲ 5020+98 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GS250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | ROPS and Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 11th percentile (1,962 lb)
A · 5020B · GS250Median Utility Tractor