Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Mitsubishi GSK255
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GSK255
Crawler
- power
- 26.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK255
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GSK255 higher · +1.2 hp (+5%)502025 hp
GSK25526.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; GSK255 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GSK255 higher · +14.3 ci (+19%)502077.1 ci
GSK25591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; GSK255 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GSK255 higher · +1 (+50%)50202
GSK2553
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; GSK255 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GSK255 higher · +4 (+50%)50208
GSK25512
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; GSK255 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
5020 (A)GSK255 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 5020 | GSK255 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Isuzu | — |
| Model | S126 | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26.2hp | ▲ GSK255+1.2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GSK255+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 91.4ci | ▲ GSK255+14.3 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.4in | ▲ 5020+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.4in | ▲ 5020+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 48in | 56.3in | ▲ GSK255+8.3 in · +17% |
| Height | 75.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | half-track | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi GSK255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Width
median 66 inA · 14th percentile (48 in)B · 31st percentile (56.3 in)
A · 5020B · GSK255Median Utility Tractor