Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Zetor 2013
ZetorModel B
Zetor 2013
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 95.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 10
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
ZetorZetor 2013
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied502025 hp
201325 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; 2013 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2013 higher · +18 ci (+23%)502077.1 ci
201395.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; 2013 is in the 22nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied50202
20132
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; 2013 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2013 higher · +2 (+25%)50208
201310
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; 2013 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
5020 (A)2013 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Zetor | — |
| Model | 5020 | 2013 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Zetor | — |
| Model | S126 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 5020+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 95.1ci | ▲ 2013+18 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.7in | ▲ 2013+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 4.3in | ▲ 2013+0.6 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 48in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 75.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 2,866lb | ▲ 2013+806 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Zetor 2013 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 22nd percentile (95.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,866 lb)
A · 5020B · 2013Median Utility Tractor