Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 6080
Row Crop
- power
- 93 hp
- displacement
- 200 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 6080 vs Kubota M95D
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M95D
Utility
- power
- 93.7 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 6080
vs
KubotaKubota M95D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ M95D higher · +0.7 hp (<1%)608093 hp
M95D93.7 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
6080 is in the 20th percentile; M95D is in the 20th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M95D higher · +30 ci (+15%)6080200 ci
M95D230 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
6080 is in the 7th percentile; M95D is in the 12th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied60804
M95D4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
6080 is in the 17th percentile; M95D is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ M95D higher · +4 (+33%)608012
M95D16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
6080 is in the 27th percentile; M95D is in the 50th · 1,200 models
6080 (A)M95D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Kubota | — |
| Model | 6080 | M95D | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Kubota | — |
| Model | 433TI | V3800-T | — |
| Power Output | 93hp | 93.7hp | ▲ M95D+0.7 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M95D+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 200ci | 230ci | ▲ M95D+30 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ M95D+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 160in | ▲ M95D+11 in · +7% |
| Width | 72.8in | 77.2in | ▲ M95D+4.4 in · +6% |
| Height | 108in | 104in | ▲ 6080+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 6,500lb | 7,253lb | ▲ M95D+753 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disk | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 6080 | Kubota M95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four-post ROPS canopy | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 20th percentile (93 hp)B · 20th percentile (93.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 7th percentile (200 ci)B · 12th percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 13th percentile (6,500 lb)B · 16th percentile (7,253 lb)
A · 6080B · M95DMedian Row Crop Tractor