Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 7060
Row Crop
- power
- 192 hp
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 7060 vs Fendt 820
FendtModel B
Fendt 820
Agricultural
- power
- 188 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 7060
vs
FendtFendt 820
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7060 higher · +4 hp (+2%)7060192 hp
820188 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7060 is in the 74th percentile; 820 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7060 higher · +56 ci (+15%)7060426 ci
820370 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7060 is in the 72nd percentile; 820 is in the 47th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied70606
8206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7060 is in the 50th percentile; 820 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 820 higher · +1,850 lb (+13%)706013,990 lb
82015,840 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
7060 is in the 62nd percentile; 820 is in the 69th · 1,350 models
7060 (A)820 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Fendt | — |
| Model | 7060 | 820 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 670I | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 192hp | 188hp | ▲ 7060+4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 7060+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 426ci | 370ci | ▲ 7060+56 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 95.5in | 102in | ▲ 820+6.5 in · +7% |
| Height | 117in | 120in | ▲ 820+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 13,990lb | 15,840lb | ▲ 820+1,850 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category III/II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 6,680lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 7060 | Fendt 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 74th percentile (192 hp)B · 72nd percentile (188 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 72nd percentile (426 ci)B · 47th percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 62nd percentile (13,990 lb)B · 69th percentile (15,840 lb)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 63rd percentile (95.5 in)B · 91st percentile (102 in)
A · 7060B · 820Median Row Crop Tractor