Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers D272
Utility
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 125 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers D272 vs Challenger MT255B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers D272
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT255B higher · +0.9 hp (+3%)D27227.5 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
D272 is in the 19th percentile; MT255B is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D272 higher · +35.7 ci (+40%)D272125 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
D272 is in the 30th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ D272 higher · +1 (+33%)D2724
MT255B3
Median Utility Tractor4
D272 is in the 50th percentile; MT255B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT255B higher · +363 lb (+18%)D2722,060 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
D272 is in the 13th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,107 models
D272 (A)MT255B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Challenger | — |
| Model | D272 | MT255B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Iseki | — |
| Model | 2.1L 4-cyl gasoline | E3CF | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28.4hp | ▲ MT255B+0.9 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT255B+850 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ D272+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 125ci | 89.3ci | ▲ D272+35.7 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.3in | ▲ D272+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 112in | ▲ MT255B+2 in · +2% |
| Width | Not recorded | 50.6in | — |
| Height | 63in | 80.7in | ▲ MT255B+17.7 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 2,423lb | ▲ MT255B+363 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,609lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 1.5gal | ▲ D272+0.6 gal · +43% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.5 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 30th percentile (125 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · D272B · MT255BMedian Utility Tractor