ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255B vs New Holland 1715
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1715
Utility
- power
- 27.3 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1715
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT255B higher · +1.1 hp (+4%)MT255B28.4 hp
171527.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255B is in the 20th percentile; 1715 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT255B higher · +8.1 ci (+10%)MT255B89.3 ci
171581.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; 1715 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT255B3
17153
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; 1715 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT255B higher · +494 lb (+26%)MT255B2,423 lb
17151,929 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; 1715 is in the 11th · 5,107 models
MT255B (A)1715 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT255B | 1715 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | E3CF | J843 | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 27.3hp | ▲ MT255B+1.1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1715+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 81.2ci | ▲ MT255B+8.1 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ MT255B+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ MT255B+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 112in | Same |
| Width | 50.6in | 51.3in | ▲ 1715+0.7 in · +1% |
| Height | 80.7in | 84.4in | ▲ 1715+3.7 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 2,423lb | 1,929lb | ▲ MT255B+494 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,609lb | 1,632lb | ▲ 1715+23 lb · +1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | New Holland 1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 11th percentile (1,929 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · MT255BB · 1715Median Utility Tractor