
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers FD3
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 95.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility

Utility

Tractor
How they compare
FD3 is in the 16th percentile; B2630HSD is in the 18th · 5,383 models
FD3 is in the 22nd percentile; B2630HSD is in the 8th · 5,580 models
FD3 is in the 3rd percentile; B2630HSD is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
FD3 is in the 23rd percentile; B2630HSD is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Kubota | — |
| Model | FD3 | B2630HSD | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Vendeuvre | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D1105-E2-D21 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ B2630HSD+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ B2630HSD+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ B2630HSD+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.8ci | 68.5ci | ▲ FD3+27.3 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | HST (Hydrostatic Transmission) 3 range | — |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 54in | — |
| Height | 51.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,150lb | 1,786lb | ▲ FD3+1,364 lb · +76% |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,676lb | — |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota B2630HSD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 0.3gal | — |
Category context