Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers HD16A
Industrial
- power
- 163 hp
- displacement
- 844 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Industrial
Allis Chalmers HD16A vs CaseIH Puma 165
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 165
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers HD16A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Industrial
Engine Displacement
▲ HD16A higher · +433 ci (+105%)HD16A844 ci
Puma 165411 ci
Median Industrial Tractor284 ci
HD16A is in the 86th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 61st · 53 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedHD16A6
Puma 1656
Median Industrial Tractor4
HD16A is in the 88th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 88th · 55 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 165 higher · +12 (+200%)HD16A6
Puma 16518
Median Industrial Tractor5
HD16A is in the 65th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 97th · 43 models
Operating Weight
▲ HD16A higher · +13,775 lb (+78%)HD16A31,500 lb
Puma 16517,725 lb
Median Industrial Tractor9,127 lb
HD16A is in the 91st percentile; Puma 165 is in the 67th · 49 models
HD16A (A)Puma 165 (B)Median Industrial Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CaseIH | — |
| Model | HD16A | Puma 165 | — |
| Category | Industrial | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CNH / FPT | — |
| Model | 160000 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 163hp | 165hp | ▲ Puma 165+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Puma 165+600 RPM · +38% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 844ci | 411ci | ▲ HD16A+433 ci · +105% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 4.1in | ▲ HD16A+1.2 in · +29% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.2in | ▲ HD16A+1.3 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 181in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.5in | 120in | ▲ Puma 165+29.5 in · +33% |
| Operating Weight | 31,500lb | 17,725lb | ▲ HD16A+13,775 lb · +78% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8-42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers HD16A | CaseIH Puma 165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 284 ciA · 86th percentile (844 ci)B · 61st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 88th percentile (6)B · 88th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 5A · 65th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 9,127 lbA · 91st percentile (31,500 lb)B · 67th percentile (17,725 lb)
Height
median 74.9 inA · 70th percentile (90.5 in)B · 94th percentile (120 in)
A · HD16AB · Puma 165Median Industrial Tractor