Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers U
Utility
- power
- 34.1 hp
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers U vs Challenger MT265B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT265B
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers U
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ U higher · +1.1 hp (+3%)U34.1 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
U is in the 27th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ U higher · +192 ci (+210%)U283 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
U is in the 83rd percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ U higher · +1 (+33%)U4
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4
U is in the 50th percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT265B higher · +4 (+100%)U4
MT265B8
Median Utility Tractor12
U is in the 4th percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
U (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Challenger | — |
| Model | U | MT265B | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Iseki | — |
| Model | Continental 4.6L 4-cyl gasoline | E3CD-VB40 | — |
| Power Output | 34.1hp | 33hp | ▲ U+1.1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MT265B+1,400 RPM · +117% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ U+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 91.4ci | ▲ U+192 ci · +210% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.4in | ▲ U+1 in · +29% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.3in | ▲ U+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 121in | ▲ MT265B+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 63.1in | 62.2in | ▲ U+0.9 in · +1% |
| Height | 53.5in | 87.4in | ▲ MT265B+33.9 in · +63% |
| Operating Weight | 5,030lb | 3,136lb | ▲ U+1,894 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,535lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 1.8gal | ▲ U+3.2 gal · +178% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 27th percentile (34.1 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (283 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,030 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)
A · UB · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor