Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers U
Utility
- power
- 34.1 hp
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers U vs McCormick Intl X10.35M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35M
Utility
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers U
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ U higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)U34.1 hp
X10.35M34 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
U is in the 27th percentile; X10.35M is in the 26th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ U higher · +182 ci (+180%)U283 ci
X10.35M101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
U is in the 83rd percentile; X10.35M is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ U higher · +1 (+33%)U4
X10.35M3
Median Utility Tractor4
U is in the 50th percentile; X10.35M is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X10.35M higher · +4 (+100%)U4
X10.35M8
Median Utility Tractor12
U is in the 4th percentile; X10.35M is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
U (A)X10.35M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | U | X10.35M | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Daedong | — |
| Model | Continental 4.6L 4-cyl gasoline | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 34.1hp | 34hp | ▲ U+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.35M+1,400 RPM · +117% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ U+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 101ci | ▲ U+182 ci · +180% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 122in | ▲ X10.35M+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 63.1in | 54.6in | ▲ U+8.5 in · +16% |
| Height | 53.5in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.35M+43.3 in · +81% |
| Operating Weight | 5,030lb | 3,151lb | ▲ U+1,879 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | McCormick Intl X10.35M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 27th percentile (34.1 hp)B · 26th percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (283 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,030 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,151 lb)
A · UB · X10.35MMedian Utility Tractor