Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers WD
Row Crop
- power
- 34.6 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers WD vs McCormick Intl X10.35H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers WD
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ WD higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)WD34.6 hp
X10.35H34 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
WD is in the 3rd percentile; X10.35H is in the 3rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ WD higher · +100 ci (+99%)WD201 ci
X10.35H101 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
WD is in the 8th percentile; X10.35H is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ WD higher · +1 (+33%)WD4
X10.35H3
Median Row Crop Tractor6
WD is in the 17th percentile; X10.35H is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Length
▲ WD higher · +5 in (+4%)WD127 in
X10.35H122 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in
WD is in the 5th percentile; X10.35H is in the 3rd · 1,157 models
WD (A)X10.35H (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | WD | X10.35H | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Daedong | — |
| Model | Allis Chalmers | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 34.6hp | 34hp | ▲ WD+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,659RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.35H+941 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ WD+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 101ci | ▲ WD+100 ci · +99% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.4in | ▲ WD+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4in | 3.6in | ▲ WD+0.4 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Non-synchronized Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 122in | ▲ WD+5 in · +4% |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.6in | — |
| Height | 81.5in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.35H+15.3 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,114lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Single Hitch Point | Rear Type I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers WD | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 3rd percentile (34.6 hp)B · 3rd percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 8th percentile (201 ci)B · 1st percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Length
median 180 inA · 5th percentile (127 in)B · 3rd percentile (122 in)
Height
median 114 inA · 14th percentile (81.5 in)B · 21st percentile (96.8 in)
A · WDB · X10.35HMedian Row Crop Tractor