Head to head · Agricultural

Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 vs McCormick Intl X50.30

Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro SRX 10400

Agricultural

power
95 hp
displacement
181 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full SRX 10400 specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl X50.30

Utility

power
95 hp
displacement
208 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
32
Full X50.30 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro SRX 10400
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 829–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
SRX 1040095 hp
X50.3095 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

SRX 10400 is in the 40th percentile; X50.30 is in the 40th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ X50.30 higher · +27 ci (+15%)
SRX 10400181 ci
X50.30208 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

SRX 10400 is in the 13th percentile; X50.30 is in the 18th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
SRX 104004
X50.304
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

SRX 10400 is in the 31st percentile; X50.30 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ X50.30 higher · +16 (+100%)
SRX 1040016
X50.3032
Median Agricultural Tractor16

SRX 10400 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30 is in the 91st · 972 models

SRX 10400 (A)X50.30 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroMcCormick Intl—
ModelSRX 10400X50.30—
CategoryAgricultural, Orchard/VineyardUtility—

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
ManufacturerVM MotoriPerkins—
ModelD754854E-E34TA—
Power Output95hp95hpSame
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,200RPM▲ SRX 10400+400 RPM · +18%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement181ci208ci▲ X50.30+27 ci · +15%
Bore3.7in3.9in▲ X50.30+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke4.2in4.3in▲ X50.30+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Type16-speedMechanical shuttle and power shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Length138in164in▲ X50.30+26 in · +19%
WidthNot recorded83in—
HeightNot recorded101in—
Operating Weight4,718lb8,030lb▲ X50.30+3,312 lb · +70%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Steering TypeHydraulic powerHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Hitch TypeRear Type II/ICategory II—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydraulic powerHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Control SystemNot recordedEGR—

Operator Station

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
TypeROPS/CabROPS/CabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 40th percentile (95 hp)B · 40th percentile (95 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 13th percentile (181 ci)B · 18th percentile (208 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 91st percentile (32)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 10th percentile (4,718 lb)B · 32nd percentile (8,030 lb)
A · SRX 10400B · X50.30Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro SRX 10400Full spec pageMcCormick Intl X50.30