Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TGF 10400
Agricultural
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 vs McCormick Intl X50.30
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.30
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TGF 10400
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedTGF 1040095 hp
X50.3095 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
TGF 10400 is in the 40th percentile; X50.30 is in the 40th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X50.30 higher · +27 ci (+15%)TGF 10400181 ci
X50.30208 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
TGF 10400 is in the 13th percentile; X50.30 is in the 18th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTGF 104004
X50.304
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
TGF 10400 is in the 31st percentile; X50.30 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ X50.30 higher · +16 (+100%)TGF 1040016
X50.3032
Median Agricultural Tractor16
TGF 10400 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30 is in the 91st · 972 models
TGF 10400 (A)X50.30 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | TGF 10400 | X50.30 | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Perkins | — |
| Model | D754 | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TGF 10400+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 208ci | ▲ X50.30+27 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.9in | ▲ X50.30+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ X50.30+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed | Mechanical shuttle and power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 164in | ▲ X50.30+31 in · +23% |
| Width | Not recorded | 83in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 8,030lb | ▲ X50.30+2,783 lb · +53% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II/I | Category II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Stage 3A | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | EGR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 40th percentile (95 hp)B · 40th percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 13th percentile (181 ci)B · 18th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 14th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 32nd percentile (8,030 lb)
A · TGF 10400B · X50.30Median Agricultural Tractor