Head to head · Utility

Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F vs McCormick Intl CT36

Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F

Utility

power
38 hp
displacement
100 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full Tigre 4000F specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl CT36

Utility

power
38 hp
displacement
107 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
12
Full CT36 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000F
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT36

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Tigre 4000F38 hp
CT3638 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Tigre 4000F is in the 31st percentile; CT36 is in the 31st · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ CT36 higher · +7 ci (+7%)
Tigre 4000F100 ci
CT36107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Tigre 4000F is in the 22nd percentile; CT36 is in the 25th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ CT36 higher · +1 (+33%)
Tigre 4000F3
CT364
Median Utility Tractor4

Tigre 4000F is in the 23rd percentile; CT36 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ CT36 higher · +4 (+50%)
Tigre 4000F8
CT3612
Median Utility Tractor12

Tigre 4000F is in the 23rd percentile; CT36 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

Tigre 4000F (A)CT36 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroMcCormick Intl—
ModelTigre 4000FCT36—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
ManufacturerYanmarMitsubishi—
Model3TNV88Not recorded—
Power Output38hp38hpSame
Rated RPM3,000RPM2,600RPM▲ Tigre 4000F+400 RPM · +15%
Cylinders34▲ CT36+1 · +33%
Displacement100ci107ci▲ CT36+7 ci · +7%
Bore3.5in3.1in▲ Tigre 4000F+0.4 in · +13%
Stroke3.5in3.6in▲ CT36+0.1 in · +3%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
TypeGearNot recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
Length116in118in▲ CT36+2 in · +2%
Width50.2in66.5in▲ CT36+16.3 in · +32%
Height75.2in89.8in▲ CT36+14.6 in · +19%
Operating Weight2,756lb2,711lb▲ Tigre 4000F+45 lb · +2%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
Hitch TypeRear Type: ICategory I—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FMcCormick Intl CT36Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 22nd percentile (100 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 20th percentile (2,756 lb)B · 19th percentile (2,711 lb)
A · Tigre 4000FB · CT36Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000FFull spec pageMcCormick Intl CT36