Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs Fendt Farmer 310LS
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 310LS
Row Crop
- power
- 92 hp
- displacement
- 253 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 21
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 310LS
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TRG 10400 higher · +3 hp (+3%)TRG 1040095 hp
Farmer 310LS92 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; Farmer 310LS is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmer 310LS higher · +72 ci (+40%)TRG 10400181 ci
Farmer 310LS253 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; Farmer 310LS is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRG 104004
Farmer 310LS4
Median Utility Tractor4
TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 310LS is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 310LS higher · +5 (+31%)TRG 1040016
Farmer 310LS21
Median Utility Tractor12
TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmer 310LS is in the 88th · 4,941 models
TRG 10400 (A)Farmer 310LS (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Fendt | — |
| Model | TRG 10400 | Farmer 310LS | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | MWM | — |
| Model | D754 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 92hp | ▲ TRG 10400+3 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ TRG 10400+250 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 253ci | ▲ Farmer 310LS+72 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.1in | ▲ Farmer 310LS+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Farmer 310LS+0.5 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 163in | ▲ Farmer 310LS+25 in · +18% |
| Width | 55.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.5in | 107in | ▲ Farmer 310LS+15.5 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 9,073lb | ▲ Farmer 310LS+3,826 lb · +73% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2R20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 320/85R24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Fendt Farmer 310LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 79th percentile (92 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 71st percentile (253 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 82nd percentile (9,073 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · Farmer 310LSMedian Utility Tractor