Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs Ford-New Holland 7710
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 7710
Row Crop
- power
- 97 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 7710
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7710 higher · +2 hp (+2%)TRG 1040095 hp
771097 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; 7710 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7710 higher · +87 ci (+48%)TRG 10400181 ci
7710268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; 7710 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRG 104004
77104
Median Utility Tractor4
TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; 7710 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedTRG 1040016
771016
Median Utility Tractor12
TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; 7710 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
TRG 10400 (A)7710 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | TRG 10400 | 7710 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Ford | — |
| Model | D754 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 97hp | ▲ 7710+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ TRG 10400+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 268ci | ▲ 7710+87 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.4in | ▲ 7710+0.7 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.4in | ▲ 7710+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 151in | ▲ 7710+13 in · +9% |
| Width | 55.7in | 76.9in | ▲ 7710+21.2 in · +38% |
| Height | 91.5in | 86.3in | ▲ TRG 10400+5.2 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 8,650lb | ▲ 7710+3,403 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2R20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 320/85R24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Ford-New Holland 7710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,650 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · 7710Median Utility Tractor