Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs Lindner Geotrac 103
LindnerModel B
Lindner Geotrac 103
Utility
- power
- 97 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
LindnerLindner Geotrac 103
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Geotrac 103 higher · +2 hp (+2%)TRG 1040095 hp
Geotrac 10397 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; Geotrac 103 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Geotrac 103 higher · +88 ci (+49%)TRG 10400181 ci
Geotrac 103269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; Geotrac 103 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRG 104004
Geotrac 1034
Median Utility Tractor4
TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; Geotrac 103 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedTRG 1040016
Geotrac 10316
Median Utility Tractor12
TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; Geotrac 103 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
TRG 10400 (A)Geotrac 103 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Lindner | — |
| Model | TRG 10400 | Geotrac 103 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Perkins | — |
| Model | D754 | 1104 | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 97hp | ▲ Geotrac 103+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TRG 10400+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 269ci | ▲ Geotrac 103+88 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.1in | ▲ Geotrac 103+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 5in | ▲ Geotrac 103+0.8 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 152in | ▲ Geotrac 103+14 in · +10% |
| Width | 55.7in | 79.5in | ▲ Geotrac 103+23.8 in · +43% |
| Height | 91.5in | 101in | ▲ Geotrac 103+9.5 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 8,203lb | ▲ Geotrac 103+2,956 lb · +56% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2R20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 320/85R24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Lindner Geotrac 103 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,203 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · Geotrac 103Median Utility Tractor