Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S
Sub-Compact
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S vs McCormick Intl C80L
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C80L
Utility
- power
- 73.7 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRX 7800S
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C80L
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ C80L higher · +2.7 hp (+4%)TRX 7800S71 hp
C80L73.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
TRX 7800S is in the 99th percentile; C80L is in the 99th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TRX 7800S higher · +2 ci (<1%)TRX 7800S203 ci
C80L201 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
TRX 7800S is in the 97th percentile; C80L is in the 96th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ TRX 7800S higher · +1 (+33%)TRX 7800S4
C80L3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
TRX 7800S is in the 90th percentile; C80L is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ TRX 7800S higher · +4 (+33%)TRX 7800S16
C80L12
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
TRX 7800S is in the 89th percentile; C80L is in the 73rd · 616 models
TRX 7800S (A)C80L (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | TRX 7800S | C80L | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1103C-33T | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 73.7hp | ▲ C80L+2.7 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TRX 7800S+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ TRX 7800S+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 203ci | 201ci | ▲ TRX 7800S+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ C80L+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ C80L+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | 153in | ▲ C80L+19 in · +14% |
| Width | 54.3in | 66.6in | ▲ C80L+12.3 in · +23% |
| Height | 93.3in | 62.4in | ▲ TRX 7800S+30.9 in · +50% |
| Operating Weight | 4,806lb | 5,190lb | ▲ C80L+384 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | McCormick Intl C80L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 99th percentile (71 hp)B · 99th percentile (73.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 97th percentile (203 ci)B · 96th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 89th percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 91st percentile (4,806 lb)B · 93rd percentile (5,190 lb)
A · TRX 7800SB · C80LMedian Sub-Compact Tractor