Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs CaseIH Farmall 25A
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 25A
Utility
- power
- 24.6 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 254
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 254 higher · +0.4 hp (+2%)25425 hp
Farmall 25A24.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +13.1 ci (+16%)25493.5 ci
Farmall 25A80.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Farmall 25A3
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 25A higher · +3 (+33%)2549
Farmall 25A12
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 50th · 4,941 models
254 (A)Farmall 25A (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 254 | Farmall 25A | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.6hp | ▲ 254+0.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ Farmall 25A+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 254+13.1 ci · +16% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 117in | ▲ 254+37 in · +32% |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | 88.2in | ▲ 254+3.1 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,469lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 24th percentile (117 in)
A · 254B · Farmall 25AMedian Utility Tractor