Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs CaseIH Farmall 25SC
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 25SC
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25SC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 254 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)25425 hp
Farmall 25SC24.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +16.3 ci (+21%)25493.5 ci
Farmall 25SC77.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Farmall 25SC3
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +57 in (+59%)254154 in
Farmall 25SC97 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 7th · 4,659 models
254 (A)Farmall 25SC (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 254 | Farmall 25SC | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 254+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Farmall 25SC+600 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 77.2ci | ▲ 254+16.3 ci · +21% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 97in | ▲ 254+57 in · +59% |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | 87.4in | ▲ 254+3.9 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,444lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375), Mid PTO 2500 | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 7th percentile (97 in)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 44th percentile (91.3 in)B · 36th percentile (87.4 in)
A · 254B · Farmall 25SCMedian Utility Tractor