Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Cub Cadet GT 3200
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet GT 3200
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet GT 3200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
GT 320025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; GT 3200 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +49.3 ci (+112%)25493.5 ci
GT 320044.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; GT 3200 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+50%)2543
GT 32002
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; GT 3200 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +82 in (+114%)254154 in
GT 320072 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; GT 3200 is in the 1st · 4,659 models
254 (A)GT 3200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | 254 | GT 3200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Kohler | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Command CH730S | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ GT 3200+1,200 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 254+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 44.2ci | ▲ 254+49.3 ci · +112% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 72in | ▲ 254+82 in · +114% |
| Width | 56.7in | 41.7in | ▲ 254+15 in · +36% |
| Height | 91.3in | 43.3in | ▲ 254+48 in · +111% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 805lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electric clutch | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | 16x7.5 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | 24x10.5 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | 0 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 1st percentile (72 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 5th percentile (41.7 in)
A · 254B · GT 3200Median Utility Tractor