Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Mitsubishi MT250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ApolloApollo 254
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
MT25025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; MT250 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +14.8 ci (+19%)25493.5 ci
MT25078.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; MT250 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
MT2503
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; MT250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied2549
MT2509
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; MT250 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
254 (A)MT250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 254 | MT250 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | K3H | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ MT250+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 78.7ci | ▲ 254+14.8 ci · +19% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 103in | ▲ 254+51 in · +50% |
| Width | 56.7in | 46.9in | ▲ 254+9.8 in · +21% |
| Height | 91.3in | 54.3in | ▲ 254+37 in · +68% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,940lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | 5.00-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | 11.2/10-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 12th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 11th percentile (103 in)
A · 254B · MT250Median Utility Tractor