Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 554 vs CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 136 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 554
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 554 higher · +1 hp (+2%)55455 hp
Farmall 55C CVT54 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
554 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 554 higher · +46 ci (+34%)554182 ci
Farmall 55C CVT136 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
554 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 35th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 554 higher · +1 (+33%)5544
Farmall 55C CVT3
Median Utility Tractor4
554 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 554 higher · +2,049 lb (+49%)5546,239 lb
Farmall 55C CVT4,190 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
554 is in the 59th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 39th · 5,107 models
554 (A)Farmall 55C CVT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 554 | Farmall 55C CVT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | FPT | — |
| Model | Xinchai 498BT | R7531E4 | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 54hp | ▲ 554+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 554+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 182ci | 136ci | ▲ 554+46 ci · +34% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 191in | 122in | ▲ 554+69 in · +57% |
| Width | 65in | 68.3in | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+3.3 in · +5% |
| Height | 98.4in | 97.4in | ▲ 554+1 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 6,239lb | 4,190lb | ▲ 554+2,049 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | exhaust-gas recirculation with diesel particulate filter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 554 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55 hp)B · 49th percentile (54 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (182 ci)B · 35th percentile (136 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,239 lb)B · 39th percentile (4,190 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (191 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 554B · Farmall 55C CVTMedian Utility Tractor