Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Challenger MT445B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT445B
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
MT445B85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; MT445B is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT445B higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
MT445B268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; MT445B is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
MT445B4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; MT445B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT445B higher · +6 (+60%)85410
MT445B16
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; MT445B is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)MT445B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Challenger | — |
| Model | 854 | MT445B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins Diesel | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 1104C | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ MT445B+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Four Speed Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,630lb | ▲ 854+1,730 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Challenger MT445B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,630 lb)
A · 854B · MT445BMedian Utility Tractor