Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Deutz D 9005
Image not recorded
DeutzModel B
Deutz D 9005
Row Crop
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 311 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
ApolloApollo 854
vs
DeutzDeutz D 9005
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
D 900585 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; D 9005 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D 9005 higher · +76 ci (+32%)854235 ci
D 9005311 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; D 9005 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ D 9005 higher · +2 (+50%)8544
D 90056
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; D 9005 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 854 higher · +2 (+25%)85410
D 90058
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; D 9005 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)D 9005 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Deutz | — |
| Model | 854 | D 9005 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Deutz | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | F6L 812 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ D 9005+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ D 9005+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 235ci | 311ci | ▲ D 9005+76 ci · +32% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 8-speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 161in | ▲ 854+63 in · +39% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 70.5in | ▲ 854+39.5 in · +56% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,103lb | ▲ 854+2,257 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.5 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz D 9005 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 85th percentile (311 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,103 lb)
A · 854B · D 9005Median Utility Tractor