Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs CaseIH 265
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 300 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
26527 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; 265 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +16.5 ci (+21%)30095.2 ci
26578.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; 265 is in the 38th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 265 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
2653
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; 265 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied3009
2659
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; 265 is in the 50th · 616 models
300 (A)265 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 300 | 265 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, High-Clearance | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27hp | ▲ 300+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ 265+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 265+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 78.7ci | ▲ 300+16.5 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.5in | ▲ 300+0.8 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Constant Mesh | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 90.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,320lb | ▲ 300+1,480 lb · +64% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | CaseIH 265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 43rd percentile (2,320 lb)
A · 300B · 265Median Sub-Compact Tractor