Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 265 vs CaseIH Farmall DX29
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX29
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 265
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX29
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +2 hp (+7%)26527 hp
Farmall DX2929 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
265 is in the 19th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 21st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +2.5 ci (+3%)26578.7 ci
Farmall DX2981.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
265 is in the 12th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2653
Farmall DX293
Median Utility Tractor4
265 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +154 lb (+7%)2652,320 lb
Farmall DX292,474 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
265 is in the 15th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 16th · 5,107 models
265 (A)Farmall DX29 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 265 | Farmall DX29 | — |
| Category | Utility, High-Clearance | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 29hp | ▲ Farmall DX29+2 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Farmall DX29+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 78.7ci | 81.2ci | ▲ Farmall DX29+2.5 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 63in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,320lb | 2,474lb | ▲ Farmall DX29+154 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 265 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 21st percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 12th percentile (78.7 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,320 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,474 lb)
A · 265B · Farmall DX29Median Utility Tractor