Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Challenger MT255B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT255B higher · +0.9 hp (+3%)30027.5 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; MT255B is in the 54th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +5.9 ci (+7%)30095.2 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; MT255B is in the 47th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ MT255B higher · +1 (+50%)3002
MT255B3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; MT255B is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 300 higher · +1,377 lb (+57%)3003,800 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
300 is in the 73rd percentile; MT255B is in the 44th · 711 models
300 (A)MT255B (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Challenger | — |
| Model | 300 | MT255B | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Iseki | — |
| Model | Not recorded | E3CF | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28.4hp | ▲ MT255B+0.9 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT255B+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT255B+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 89.3ci | ▲ 300+5.9 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.4in | ▲ 300+0.3 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.3in | ▲ 300+1 in · +30% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 112in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 50.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 80.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,423lb | ▲ 300+1,377 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,609lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 54th percentile (28.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 47th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 44th percentile (2,423 lb)
A · 300B · MT255BMedian Sub-Compact Tractor