Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Yanmar FV-280
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-280
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-280
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ FV-280 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)30027.5 hp
FV-28027.6 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; FV-280 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +3.7 ci (+4%)30095.2 ci
FV-28091.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; FV-280 is in the 51st · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ FV-280 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
FV-2803
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; FV-280 is in the 50th · 802 models
300 (A)FV-280 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 300 | FV-280 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Yanmar | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.6hp | ▲ FV-280+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,650RPM | ▲ FV-280+250 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ FV-280+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 91.5ci | ▲ 300+3.7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.4in | ▲ 300+0.3 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.5in | ▲ 300+0.8 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 51st percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · 300B · FV-280Median Sub-Compact Tractor