Image not recorded
BaldwinModel A
Baldwin DM300
Articulated
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Articulated
Baldwin DM300 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
BaldwinBaldwin DM300
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ DM300 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DM300290 hp
65C285 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
DM300 is in the 4th percentile; 65C is in the 4th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +27 ci (+4%)DM300611 ci
65C638 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
DM300 is in the 9th percentile; 65C is in the 16th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDM3006
65C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
DM300 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 61 models
DM300 (A)65C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baldwin | Challenger | — |
| Model | DM300 | 65C | — |
| Category | Articulated, Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | LTA-10A | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 285hp | ▲ DM300+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+27 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.8in | ▲ DM300+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 6in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 32,875lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 4th percentile (290 hp)B · 4th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 9th percentile (611 ci)B · 16th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · DM300B · 65CMedian Articulated Tractor