Image not recorded
BaldwinModel A
Baldwin DP400
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 893 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Baldwin DP400 vs Challenger MT765E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765E
Articulated
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
BaldwinBaldwin DP400
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT765E higher · +5 hp (+1%)DP400400 hp
MT765E405 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
DP400 is in the 53rd percentile; MT765E is in the 55th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DP400 higher · +294 ci (+49%)DP400893 ci
MT765E599 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
DP400 is in the 69th percentile; MT765E is in the 19th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT765E higher · +1 (+17%)DP4006
MT765E7
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
DP400 is in the 50th percentile; MT765E is in the 88th · 159 models
DP400 (A)MT765E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baldwin | Challenger | — |
| Model | DP400 | MT765E | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO POWER | — |
| Model | 14.6L 6-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 400hp | 405hp | ▲ MT765E+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT765E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 893ci | 599ci | ▲ DP400+294 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 4.4in | ▲ DP400+1 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.7in | ▲ DP400+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 33,235lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Cat 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 39,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Baldwin DP400 | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 53rd percentile (400 hp)B · 55th percentile (405 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 69th percentile (893 ci)B · 19th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 88th percentile (7)
A · DP400B · MT765EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor