Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025 MIG
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1025 MIG vs CaseIH Farmall 115U
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 115U
Agricultural
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 1025 MIG
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 115U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied1025 MIG115 hp
Farmall 115U115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1025 MIG is in the 88th percentile; Farmall 115U is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +82 ci (+39%)1025 MIG290 ci
Farmall 115U208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; Farmall 115U is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1025 MIG4
Farmall 115U4
Median Utility Tractor4
1025 MIG is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 115U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +4 (+33%)1025 MIG16
Farmall 115U12
Median Utility Tractor12
1025 MIG is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 115U is in the 50th · 4,941 models
1025 MIG (A)Farmall 115U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 1025 MIG | Farmall 115U | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | FPT | — |
| Model | D-242c | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 115U+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 208ci | ▲ 1025 MIG+82 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 164in | ▲ 1025 MIG+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 78in | 83in | ▲ Farmall 115U+5 in · +6% |
| Height | 114in | 103in | ▲ 1025 MIG+11 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 9,469lb | 9,370lb | ▲ 1025 MIG+99 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Open Center | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,469 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,370 lb)
A · 1025 MIGB · Farmall 115UMedian Utility Tractor