Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025 MIG
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1025 MIG vs Ford-New Holland 8210
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 8210
Row Crop
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 401 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
BelarusBelarus 1025 MIG
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 8210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied1025 MIG115 hp
8210115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1025 MIG is in the 88th percentile; 8210 is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8210 higher · +111 ci (+38%)1025 MIG290 ci
8210401 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; 8210 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8210 higher · +2 (+50%)1025 MIG4
82106
Median Utility Tractor4
1025 MIG is in the 50th percentile; 8210 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1025 MIG16
821016
Median Utility Tractor12
1025 MIG is in the 73rd percentile; 8210 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
1025 MIG (A)8210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | 1025 MIG | 8210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Ford | — |
| Model | D-242c | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 8210+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 8210+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 401ci | ▲ 8210+111 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 8210+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 177in | ▲ 8210+11 in · +7% |
| Width | 78in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 114in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,469lb | 8,730lb | ▲ 1025 MIG+739 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | Ford-New Holland 8210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | 5.6gal | ▲ 8210+0.3 gal · +6% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 90th percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,469 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,730 lb)
A · 1025 MIGB · 8210Median Utility Tractor