BelarusModel A
Belarus 2011
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 69.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 2011 vs Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 44.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 2011
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet LTX 1050 KW
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied201122 hp
LTX 1050 KW22 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2011 is in the 11th percentile; LTX 1050 KW is in the 11th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2011 higher · +25.6 ci (+58%)201169.9 ci
LTX 1050 KW44.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2011 is in the 10th percentile; LTX 1050 KW is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20112
LTX 1050 KW2
Median Utility Tractor4
2011 is in the 3rd percentile; LTX 1050 KW is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2011 higher · +2,055 lb (+376%)20112,602 lb
LTX 1050 KW547 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
2011 is in the 18th percentile; LTX 1050 KW is in the 1st · 5,107 models
2011 (A)LTX 1050 KW (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | 2011 | LTX 1050 KW | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Slavia | Kawasaki | — |
| Model | 2S90A | FR651V | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 22hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.9ci | 44.3ci | ▲ 2011+25.6 ci · +58% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 2011+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3in | ▲ 2011+0.5 in · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 68.9in | ▲ 2011+37.1 in · +54% |
| Width | 48.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 80.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,602lb | 547lb | ▲ 2011+2,055 lb · +376% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual sector and pinion | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electric clutch | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual sector and pinion | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LTX 1050 KW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 11th percentile (22 hp)B · 11th percentile (22 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.9 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,602 lb)B · 1st percentile (547 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 1st percentile (68.9 in)
A · 2011B · LTX 1050 KWMedian Utility Tractor