Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 220
Sub-Compact
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Sub-Compact
Tractor
How they compare
220 is in the 32nd percentile; AF324 is in the 39th · 816 models
220 is in the 11th percentile; AF324 is in the 50th · 802 models
220 is in the 89th percentile; AF324 is in the 89th · 616 models
220 is in the 51st percentile; AF324 is in the 47th · 711 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 220 | AF324 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Slavia | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNE82 | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 24hp | ▲ AF324+2 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ AF324+1 · +50% |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Power shuttle | — |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 50.4in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 76.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,750lb | 2,568lb | ▲ 220+182 lb · +7% |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
| Spec | Belarus 220 | Yanmar AF324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context