Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs CaseIH Farmall 25SC
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 25SC
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25SC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 254 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)25425 hp
Farmall 25SC24.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 43rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +9.8 ci (+13%)25487 ci
Farmall 25SC77.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 37th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Farmall 25SC3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 25SC is in the 50th · 802 models
254 (A)Farmall 25SC (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 254 | Farmall 25SC | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Yanmar | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 254+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 3,000RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87ci | 77.2ci | ▲ 254+9.8 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 97in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 87.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,444lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375), Mid PTO 2500 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 37th percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · 254B · Farmall 25SCMedian Sub-Compact Tractor