Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
21025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; 210 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +9.9 ci (+13%)25487 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; 210 is in the 36th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+50%)2543
2102
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 210 higher · +4 (+50%)2548
21012
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
254 is in the 40th percentile; 210 is in the 73rd · 616 models
254 (A)210 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 254 | 210 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Toyosha | — |
| Model | Not recorded | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 254+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 87ci | 77.1ci | ▲ 254+9.9 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,325lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 36th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 11th percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (12)
A · 254B · 210Median Sub-Compact Tractor