
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1000 vs Massey Ferguson 210

Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 1000
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied100025 hp
21025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1000 is in the 16th percentile; 210 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1000 higher · +0.5 ci (<1%)100077.6 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1000 is in the 11th percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10002
2102
Median Utility Tractor4
1000 is in the 3rd percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 210 higher · +3 (+33%)10009
21012
Median Utility Tractor12
1000 is in the 35th percentile; 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
1000 (A)210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 1000 | 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Toyosha | — |
| Model | LE892 | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.6ci | 77.1ci | ▲ 1000+0.5 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 210+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ 1000+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 54.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,300lb | 2,325lb | ▲ 210+25 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | open center | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | 540 (1.375) | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | 1.3gal | ▲ 1000+0.1 gal · +8% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · 1000B · 210Median Utility Tractor