Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs Mitsubishi MT260
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT260
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT260 higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
MT26026 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; MT260 is in the 49th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +6.6 ci (+8%)25487 ci
MT26080.4 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; MT260 is in the 40th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
MT2603
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; MT260 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT260 higher · +1 (+13%)2548
MT2609
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
254 is in the 40th percentile; MT260 is in the 50th · 616 models
254 (A)MT260 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 254 | MT260 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ MT260+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 254+6.6 ci · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 115in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 52in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 87in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,458lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 49th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 40th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (9)
A · 254B · MT260Median Sub-Compact Tractor