Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 210 vs Mitsubishi MT260
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT260
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT260 higher · +1 hp (+4%)21025 hp
MT26026 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
210 is in the 16th percentile; MT260 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT260 higher · +3.3 ci (+4%)21077.1 ci
MT26080.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
210 is in the 11th percentile; MT260 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT260 higher · +1 (+50%)2102
MT2603
Median Utility Tractor4
210 is in the 3rd percentile; MT260 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 210 higher · +3 (+33%)21012
MT2609
Median Utility Tractor12
210 is in the 50th percentile; MT260 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
210 (A)MT260 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 210 | MT260 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | P126 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ MT260+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MT260+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT260+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 80.4ci | ▲ MT260+3.3 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 115in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 52in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 87in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,325lb | 2,458lb | ▲ MT260+133 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,458 lb)
A · 210B · MT260Median Utility Tractor