Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs New Holland Boomer 1025
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 1025
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 1025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ Boomer 1025 higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
Boomer 102526 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 49th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +18 ci (+26%)25487 ci
Boomer 102569 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 32nd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Boomer 10253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 50th · 802 models
254 (A)Boomer 1025 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | New Holland | — |
| Model | 254 | Boomer 1025 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ Boomer 1025+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 3,000RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87ci | 69ci | ▲ 254+18 ci · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 96.6in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 46.4in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 72.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,455lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 49th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 32nd percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · 254B · Boomer 1025Median Sub-Compact Tractor